Key Points
- The manager of Oldham Athletic, Micky Mellon, has talked about his side’s attacking choices and whether they can sign another striker.
- Micky Mellon pointed out that he cannot regulate how many chances his side have and do not manage to capitalize on in games.
- These remarks from the manager emphasize the significance of becoming more efficient in front of the goal.
- Oldham boosted their team considerably last summer, making 12 signings: 11 were free transfers while the other one was on loan, as reported by BBC Sport.
- It seems that Oldham’s approach to transfer dealings is still determined by financial restrictions and available players.
- Michael Mellon is not going to come back to Oldham after moving permanently to Stevenage.
- Elliott Nevitt is one of the attacking players who plays under Micky Mellon at Boundary Park.
- The immediate impact of this situation will depend on how well Oldham’s attackers will manage to score their goals.
- Oldham fans may keep looking into the free agents’ market for the right player for their team.
Oldham (Manchester Mirror) September 22, 2026 – manager Micky Mellon has addressed the club’s striker situation and attacking options after the Latics were criticised for failing to make the most of opportunities in front of goal.
- Key Points
- What did Micky Mellon say about Oldham’s chances?
- Is Oldham looking for another striker?
- What happened with Michael Mellon?
- Who are Oldham’s attacking options?
- Why is finishing important for Oldham?
- How has Oldham’s recruitment changed?
- What has Micky Mellon said about his team’s progress?
- What happens next for Oldham Athletic?
- Background to Oldham’s striker situation
- How could this affect Oldham supporters?
The most important development is that Micky Mellon has acknowledged Oldham Athletic’s attacking concerns while making clear that the team’s missed chances are not entirely within his control. His comments point to a balance between improving the forwards already at the club and remaining alert to possible recruitment opportunities.
The comments, reported by The Oldham Times in its article titled “Oldham Athletic manager addresses striker situation and gives thoughts on free agents”, come as Mellon continues to assess the effectiveness of his forward line. The report states that the manager insists he cannot legislate for the volume and quality of chances being missed by his side.
The wording suggests that Mellon does not believe the issue can be reduced simply to the presence or absence of one striker. Instead, the manager’s assessment appears to focus on the wider attacking process, including the creation of chances, the decisions made in the final third and the finishing that follows.
What did Micky Mellon say about Oldham’s chances?
According to The Oldham Times, Micky Mellon said he could not control how many opportunities his players missed or the quality of those chances. The comment reflects the difficulty managers face when a team creates promising openings but does not turn them into goals.
A striker can be judged by the number of goals scored, but the overall performance of an attack is also affected by service from midfield, the movement of forwards, the timing of passes and the quality of decisions made near the penalty area.
Mellon’s position indicates that Oldham’s attacking problem may require more than signing another forward. If the team is already producing regular chances, the priority could be to improve composure and efficiency. If the chances are not clear enough, the solution may instead involve better attacking combinations and more consistent service.
The manager’s comments therefore provide no indication that a new signing alone would automatically solve the problem. Recruitment may remain an option, but the current squad will still be expected to improve its output.
Is Oldham looking for another striker?
Oldham’s approach appears to be shaped by the usual constraints faced by clubs operating outside the wealthiest levels of English football. Suitable forwards may be difficult to find, while players with a proven record of scoring goals can command wages or transfer fees beyond a club’s budget.
Earlier reporting has shown that Mellon has previously spoken openly about recruitment opportunities and the club’s limited financial resources. In comments reported by The Oldham Times, he said Oldham would continue looking for opportunities but did not have an unlimited pot of money. He added that the club would consider a player if the signing could make the team better.
That background is important because it places the current striker discussion within a longer recruitment strategy. Oldham may be willing to act if the right player becomes available, but the club is unlikely to sign a forward simply to increase the number of players in the squad.
The decision would be expected to depend on several factors:
- Whether the player has the qualities Mellon wants.
- Whether the player is available on affordable terms.
- Whether the signing would improve the team immediately.
- Whether the club can maintain balance across the rest of the squad.
- Whether existing forwards can provide enough goals and attacking contribution.
What happened with Michael Mellon?
Michael Mellon is not expected to return to Oldham Athletic. Previous reports established that the striker’s permanent signing was beyond the club’s current financial reach.
In June, The Oldham Times reported that Micky Mellon had warned supporters not to build their hopes around another spell for his son. The manager said the situation was “generally just finances” and that Michael would have “many suitors”.
The manager also said Michael was not in Oldham’s plans for the following season because the club probably could not complete the deal. That position later became clearer when Michael Mellon completed a permanent transfer to Stevenage.
According to a report published by Oldham Athletic News, Micky Mellon reassured supporters that players of Michael’s level could become attainable again if the club continued to grow. However, the manager confirmed that the striker was out of reach at that stage because of the financial realities of the transfer market.
Michael Mellon’s departure means Oldham cannot rely on the forward who impressed during his previous spell at Boundary Park. The club must therefore assess its current group and decide whether another player is needed to provide goals, physical presence or competition for places.
Who are Oldham’s attacking options?
Oldham’s attacking group includes Elliott Nevitt, who has been reunited with Micky Mellon. In a September interview reported by The Oldham Times, Nevitt described Mellon as a demanding manager and said the boss wanted him to improve.
Nevitt’s comments provide an indication of the expectations placed on Oldham’s forwards. Mellon’s approach appears to involve demanding greater standards from players who already have experience of working under him, rather than relying only on external recruitment.
The club also has to manage the wider squad situation, including player availability, injuries and the form of its forwards. Previous reporting has shown that Oldham have experienced striker-related issues before, with injuries affecting players during pre-season and the opening stages of a campaign.
Mellon has consistently indicated that recruitment is an ongoing process. In an earlier interview reported by The Oldham Times, he said a club could not simply decide that its squad was complete and stop trying to improve it. He described recruitment as a matter of continuing to watch matches, speak to managers and gather recommendations.
That approach leaves open the possibility of further movement, particularly if Oldham’s scoring numbers remain below expectations. However, it also means that the manager is likely to judge the existing forwards over a period of matches before reaching a final conclusion.
Why is finishing important for Oldham?
Finishing is particularly important for a side seeking consistency because missed chances can change the outcome of closely contested matches. A team may control periods of a game and still fail to collect points if it cannot convert its best opportunities.
For Oldham, the issue is not limited to individual players. The team’s overall attacking efficiency will influence how successfully it competes across the season. The forwards must convert chances, but teammates must also create the conditions for those chances to be taken.
Mellon’s comments suggest that he is attempting to separate responsibility fairly. The manager cannot take the final shot himself, but he can influence the structure of the team, the players selected and the way Oldham approach attacking situations.
A more clinical Oldham side would not necessarily need to create significantly more chances to improve results. Converting a greater proportion of existing opportunities could be enough to turn draws into victories or narrow defeats into points.
At the same time, persistent misses could increase pressure on the manager and the recruitment department. If the club believes that the current group lacks a particular type of striker, the free-agent market could become relevant.
How has Oldham’s recruitment changed?
Oldham made substantial changes to their squad during the summer. BBC Sport reported that the club added 12 players, including 11 free transfers and one loan signing.
The number of additions shows that the club has already undertaken considerable recruitment work. It also indicates why any further signing would need to be carefully considered. Adding another player would have to fit the squad’s financial structure and tactical requirements.
Mellon has previously spoken about taking a more considered approach to recruitment rather than rushing into deals. Oldham Athletic News reported that the manager wanted the club to assess situations carefully because the team was no longer entering an unknown campaign.
That approach may help Oldham avoid a short-term decision based solely on frustration after missed chances. It also places greater responsibility on the players already at the club to demonstrate that they can deliver.
The free-agent market can provide opportunities after transfer windows close, but availability does not always equal suitability. A player without a club may require time to regain match fitness, adapt to the manager’s style or build an understanding with teammates.
What has Micky Mellon said about his team’s progress?
BBC Sport reported earlier in September that Mellon was very satisfied with Oldham’s strong start to the League Two season. That assessment provides context for the current discussion about attacking efficiency.
A team can make a strong start while still having areas that require improvement. Mellon’s comments about missed opportunities do not necessarily mean that Oldham’s overall campaign has gone badly. Instead, they show that the manager is focusing on one area that could determine whether the club maintains its progress.
The manager has also previously spoken about decisions costing Oldham and the need for the team to become more clinical. BBC programme listings recorded interviews in which Mellon discussed decisions and finishing.
Those remarks suggest a continuing theme rather than a completely new concern. The club’s challenge is to ensure that missed chances do not become a recurring feature of performances.
What happens next for Oldham Athletic?
Oldham’s next steps are likely to involve continued assessment of the current forwards, alongside monitoring the availability of players who could improve the squad.
The club may decide that its existing options are sufficient if the team continues creating chances and begins converting them more regularly. Alternatively, a dip in results or a shortage of goals could encourage the recruitment team to explore the free-agent market.
Mellon’s comments do not confirm a specific target, and there is no evidence in the available reporting that Oldham have completed a new striker signing connected with this development. Any future move should therefore be treated as separate from the manager’s current assessment unless the club makes an official announcement.
The immediate focus will be on performance rather than speculation. Oldham’s forwards will be judged by their movement, link-up play, work rate and ability to finish, while the team’s creative players will also need to provide reliable service.
Background to Oldham’s striker situation
Oldham Athletic returned to the English Football League after promotion and have been reshaping their squad under Micky Mellon. The club’s recruitment has relied heavily on free transfers, with BBC Sport reporting 11 free signings and one loan addition during the summer.
Michael Mellon’s previous spell at Oldham created interest among supporters, but the club could not compete financially for a permanent deal. The striker subsequently moved to Stevenage, ending the possibility of an immediate return to Boundary Park.
Micky Mellon has repeatedly presented recruitment as an ongoing process. However, he has also acknowledged that Oldham do not have unlimited funds and must identify players who provide sufficient value.
The current discussion about missed chances is therefore linked to three developments: the departure of Michael Mellon, the club’s reliance on its existing attacking group and the need to spend carefully if another forward becomes available.
How could this affect Oldham supporters?
The development is likely to keep Oldham Athletic’s attacking performance under close observation. Supporters will want to see whether the club’s existing forwards can convert more chances before concluding that another striker is essential.
If Oldham continue creating opportunities and improve their finishing, Mellon’s decision to trust the current squad could be justified. If the misses persist and results suffer, pressure may increase for the club to find an additional forward.
The financial element means supporters may need to expect a measured approach rather than an immediate high-profile signing. Oldham’s recruitment policy is based on finding affordable players who fit the manager’s requirements, not simply reacting to every missed chance.
For the audience following the Latics, the clearest indicator will be the relationship between chances, goals and results. A stronger conversion rate could reduce concerns, while a sustained lack of goals would make the search for attacking reinforcements more urgent.
