Man from Stockport sentenced for rape of sex worker 2026

Key Points

• Eisen Vir Raganit, 46, from Westwood Road, Stockport, received a sentence of five years in prison on October 6, 2026, Tuesday, after being found guilty by a jury for raping a prostitute in North Yorkshire.
• This happened in October 2024 when Raganit booked a service from the victim through the victim’s website where it was written that she needed to wear condoms, which he did not put back during sexual intercourse.
• The victim protested against this behavior, ordered him to leave, and then complained to the police about this crime; Raganit claimed his innocence and pleaded not guilty but was convicted at York Crown Court in August 2026.
• Raganit was sentenced by Judge Sean Morris at York Crown Court; he called this rape an obvious violation of consent; Raganit was put in the sex offenders register for life.
• North Yorkshire Police said the officers found evidence of videos on Raganit’s mobile phone about the non-consensual removal of condoms during sex.

Stockport (Manchester Mirror) October 06, 2026 – A 46‑year‑old man from Stockport has been sentenced to five years in prison after being convicted of raping a sex worker in her North Yorkshire home, in a case centred on the non‑consensual removal of a condom during sex.

Eisen Vir Raganit, of Westwood Road, Stockport, was found guilty by a unanimous jury verdict following a trial at York Crown Court in August 2026, and was sentenced on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, by Judge Sean Morris. In addition to the custodial term, he was placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely.

What happened in the October 2024 incident?

According to North Yorkshire Police, Raganit arranged to meet the victim at her home in North Yorkshire in October 2024 after booking a session through an online platform linked to her website. The victim, who waived her right to anonymity in relation to her occupation, had made it clear both on her website and before the encounter that clients must wear a condom.

During sexual activity, Raganit deliberately removed the condom without the victim’s knowledge or consent and continued having sex. As reported by journalists covering the sentencing, the victim immediately challenged him and asked him to leave before later reporting the incident to police.

How did the investigation and court case unfold?

Following the report, officers investigated and subsequently charged Raganit with rape. He denied the allegation throughout police interviews and entered a not guilty plea when he appeared in court.

At trial in August 2026, both the defendant and the victim gave evidence, and the jury returned a unanimous guilty verdict. Sentencing him on Tuesday, Judge Sean Morris said the offence had involved a clear breach of the victim’s consent.

As reported by BBC News, a spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police said officers later found material on Raganit’s mobile phone, including videos depicting the non‑consensual removal of condoms during sex.

What did police and the court say about the offence?

North Yorkshire Police described the incident as a rape committed through “stealthing” – the term used for removing a condom during sex without a partner’s knowledge or consent. A force spokesperson highlighted that the victim had explicitly stated her condition for condom use, both online and in person, before the encounter.

At York Crown Court on 6 October 2026, Raganit was jailed for five years and placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely. Judge Sean Morris, in imposing the sentence, emphasised the seriousness of the breach of consent involved in the offence.

Lorraine Whipp of North Yorkshire Police praised the victim for her bravery during the process, stressing the importance of reporting sexual offences regardless of occupation.

What evidence was found on the defendant’s phone?

During the investigation, officers examined Raganit’s mobile phone and discovered material relevant to the case. As reported by local outlets including Examiner Live and Hello Radio, this included videos depicting the non‑consensual removal of condoms during sex.

The presence of such material was cited by police as part of the broader context of the offence and the defendant’s conduct.

How was the case reported across different media titles?

The case was covered by multiple outlets, each attributing details to North Yorkshire Police and court proceedings. As reported by the BBC, Raganit was described as a man who removed a condom during sex without the woman’s consent and was jailed for five years for raping a sex worker.

The York Press reported that Raganit had travelled from Stockport to North Yorkshire after booking a session via the victim’s website, and had researched “stealthing” before the encounter. Examiner Live noted that he was jailed at York Crown Court on Tuesday, October 6, and highlighted the police discovery of relevant material on his phone.

Hello Radio’s coverage focused on the sentencing outcome and the indefinite placement on the sex offenders register, quoting police praise for the victim’s courage. The North Yorkshire Police website published an official court results notice confirming the five‑year term and the defendant’s details.

Background of the development

The case forms part of a wider pattern of prosecutions in England and Wales where “stealthing” – the non‑consensual removal of a condom during sex – has been treated by courts as rape when it vitiates consent. Legal guidance and case law have increasingly recognised that consent given on the condition of condom use can be nullified if protection is removed without agreement, turning the act into a non‑consensual sexual offence.

In this instance, the explicit condition set by the victim on her website and reiterated before the encounter provided a clear basis for establishing that consent was conditional on condom use. The jury’s unanimous guilty verdict and the subsequent five‑year sentence reflect the courts’ approach to treating such breaches of conditional consent as serious sexual offences.

Prediction: how this development may affect sex workers and clients

This development is likely to reinforce awareness among sex workers that explicit, documented conditions around condom use can be central to establishing lack of consent in court if those conditions are breached. For sex workers, the public reporting of this case and the police emphasis on the victim’s bravery may encourage more individuals to report similar incidents, knowing that “stealthing” can be prosecuted as rape.

For clients, the five‑year custodial sentence and indefinite registration as a sex offender send a clear deterrent message that removing protection without consent carries severe criminal consequences. Over time, this may lead to greater caution and compliance with agreed safety conditions in commercial sexual encounters, potentially reducing the incidence of such offences.