Key Points
- Imaad Choudry, 23, of Turnberry Road, Heald Green, Cheadle, Manchester, was sentenced to 32 months in prison at Chester Crown Court on Friday 26 June 2026.
- He pleaded guilty to two counts of possession with intent to supply Class A drugs: cocaine and MDMA.
- On Sunday 24 August 2025, Choudry tried to enter the Creamfields Festival in Daresbury when a drugs dog flagged him.
- Security took him to a private area where he admitted he had hidden bags of cocaine and MDMA tablets in his anus.
- Officers recovered 14 bags of cocaine and nine MDMA tablets, with an estimated street value of £640–£800.
- Choudry was arrested and charged before appearing at Chester Crown Court for sentencing.
- Police Constable Lisa Green of Cheshire Police said Choudry had “seriously underestimated” the capability of police dogs.
- Authorities warned that Cheshire Police will remain “out in force” at this year’s festival and anyone found with drugs will be held accountable.
- The case adds to a list of previous offenders who will not be attending this year’s Creamfields due to convictions or bans.
Manchester (Liverpool standard) July 07, 2026 – A Manchester man who travelled to a music festival in Cheshire loaded with drugs to sell to festival-goers has been jailed for 32 months after hiding Class A substances in his anus, a tactic that police dogs quickly exposed. Imaad Choudry appeared at Chester Crown Court on Friday 26 June 2026, where he was sentenced following his earlier guilty pleas to two counts of possession with intent to supply Class A drugs: cocaine and MDMA. The case has drawn attention from Cheshire Police, who highlighted the effectiveness of their four-legged officers and warned that drug dealers attempting to enter Creamfields Festival will face serious consequences.
- Key Points
- How did Imaad Choudry end up in court after Creamfields?
- What charges did he face and how did he plead?
- What did police say about the sentence and the role of drugs dogs?
- What does this case tell us about drug enforcement at music festivals?
- Who is Imaad Choudry and what is known about his background?
- What impact could this case have on festival security and drug policy?
- Background: Development of drug enforcement at UK music festivals
- Prediction: How this development can affect festival-goers and local communities
- Impact on festival-goers
- Impact on local communities
How did Imaad Choudry end up in court after Creamfields?
As reported by the court proceedings summarised in Cheshire Police statements, the court heard that on Sunday 24 August 2025, Choudry attempted to enter the Creamfields Festival in Daresbury when a drugs dog indicated that he was in possession of illegal drugs. He was taken to a private area by security where he openly admitted that he had hidden a quantity of cocaine and MDMA in his anus. A total of 14 bags of cocaine and nine MDMA tablets were recovered in total, with an estimated street value of between £640 and £800.
What charges did he face and how did he plead?
According to the facts laid out at Chester Crown Court, the 23-year-old of Turnberry Road, Heald Green, Cheadle, had earlier pleaded guilty to two counts of possession with intent to supply Class A drugs (cocaine and MDMA). These charges reflect the seriousness with which the courts treat attempts to supply prohibited substances at large public events, particularly festivals where thousands of young people gather.
Following his guilty pleas, Imaad Choudry appeared at Chester Crown Court on Friday 26 June 2026 where he was jailed for 32 months. The length of the sentence reflects both the nature of the drugs involved (Class A) and the intent to supply them to festival-goers, rather than simple personal possession.
What did police say about the sentence and the role of drugs dogs?
Following the sentencing, Police Constable Lisa Green said: “Choudry thought that he could outsmart officers by hiding his illegal drugs in his anus, however he seriously underestimated the capabilities of our four-legged colleagues who took just seconds to sniff him out”. She added: “As a result of his actions, he’s now facing a significant prison sentence meaning that he won’t be able to attend this year’s festival”.
What does this case tell us about drug enforcement at music festivals?
The Cheshire Police statement emphasises that the drugs dog took “just seconds to sniff him out”, despite Choudry’s attempt to conceal the drugs in a highly unusual and difficult-to-detect location. This underlines the specialised training of police dogs and their ability to detect even small quantities of cocaine and MDMA, regardless of how they are hidden.
Police Constable Lisa Green continued: “While we know that Chowdry, along with dozens of other previous offenders, won’t be attending this year’s festival, make no mistake the team here at Cheshire Police will be out in force, and anyone found with illegal drugs will be held accountable”. The wording signals that this is not an isolated crackdown but part of a sustained effort to deter drug dealing at major events.
Who is Imaad Choudry and what is known about his background?
From court records and police statements, Imaad Choudry is a 23-year-old man from Turnberry Road, Heald Green, Cheadle, in the Manchester area. No further personal details, such as occupation or prior convictions, have been publicly released in the summary provided by Cheshire Police.
The Cheshire Police statement notes that Choudry is among “dozens of other previous offenders” excluded from this year’s festival, suggesting that he may have prior involvement in drug-related activity or that the police have a broader list of individuals banned or targeted due to past behaviour. However, the available information does not specify any earlier convictions beyond the current charges.
What impact could this case have on festival security and drug policy?
Cases like Choudry’s often lead festival organisers to review entry procedures, increase presence of security and police, and potentially introduce more rigorous screening at gates. Heightened enforcement can also encourage organisers to work more closely with local authorities to share intelligence on known dealers.
For young people attending Creamfields and similar events, the sentence reinforces that attempts to sell or supply drugs at festivals are treated seriously and can result in long prison terms. It also underlines the risk that even “private” or concealed methods of carrying drugs are unlikely to succeed against trained police dogs and coordinated security.
Background: Development of drug enforcement at UK music festivals
This case reflects a continuing trend in which UK police and festival security treat drug dealing at large-scale events as a high-priority enforcement area. Over the last decade, operations at major festivals such as Creamfields, Glastonbury, and Reading have increasingly relied on specialist teams, including drugs dogs, sniffer technology, and targeted intelligence on known dealers.
The Cheshire Police statement indicates that Choudry is among “dozens of other previous offenders” excluded from this year’s festival, suggesting that authorities maintain lists of individuals who have previously been involved in drug offences or who are considered high-risk attendees. This approach aligns with broader strategies seen across the UK, where police and event organisers collaborate to deter drug supply rather than focusing solely on individual consumption.
Sentences of more than two years for possession with intent to supply Class A drugs at festivals are consistent with court practice in recent years, where the intent to supply in a public, high-attendance setting is treated as an aggravating factor. The case of Imaad Choudry therefore sits within an established framework of enforcement and sentencing rather than representing a sudden policy shift.
Prediction: How this development can affect festival-goers and local communities
Impact on festival-goers
For young people planning to attend Creamfields and similar festivals, this case sends a clear warning that drug dealing will be met with swift detection and serious punishment. The emphasis on police dogs and “out in force” tactics suggests that gate checks will remain stringent, and attempts to smuggle drugs in unusual ways are unlikely to succeed. This may lead some attendees to reconsider carrying or supplying drugs, potentially reducing the availability of drugs on site, though it is unlikely to eliminate demand entirely.
There is also a psychological effect: the publicity around a 32-month sentence for a relatively small quantity of drugs (street value £640–£800) may deter marginal offenders who previously believed the risk was low. However, experienced dealers may adapt by changing tactics, using different entry points, or relying on insiders, which could shift the nature of the problem rather than remove it.
Impact on local communities
For communities around Daresbury and the wider Cheshire area, continued high-profile enforcement can improve perceptions of safety during festival periods, as visible police presence often reassures residents and local businesses. However, if enforcement is perceived as overly aggressive, it may also create tension between police and some festival attendees or local youth groups who feel targeted.
In the longer term, consistent sentencing and publicised cases like Choudry’s may encourage a cultural shift where drug dealing at festivals is seen as not just risky but socially unacceptable within certain peer groups. For parents and educators in Islamabad and similar settings where young people discuss UK festivals, this case can be used as a realistic example of the legal consequences of attempting to supply drugs at large events, reinforcing messages about the dangers of drug involvement without relying on exaggeration or opinion.
